1849
Great Britain and United
States
close to war
over the
Oregon
Boundary Dispute
Strong Anti-British Sentiment Among U.S. Population
Riot in New York: 23 dead, dozens injured
Important Diplomatic Messages
carried between London and
Washington
by Cunard's Royal Mail Steamships
Breaking News carried to New York and Boston newspapers
by
the Nova Scotia Pony Express
Astor Place Riot
New York, May 10th
1849
23 dead, dozens injured
The Globe and Mail
23 April 1999
Today is
Shakespeare's birthday. Speaking of anniversaries, the Bard of Avon was
indirectly involved in one of the bloodiest riots in the United States, 150
years ago next month. Rival interpretations of Macbeth were at stake in
New York. Before it was over, 23 people were dead and dozens more were wounded.
Some notes about the Astor Place riot:
The dispute grew out of a
conflict between two Shakespearean stage idols: English thespian William
Macready (ex-lawyer, intellectual snob, understated style) and U.S. tragedian
Edwin Forrest (brawny, histrionic, melodramatic style).
In 1844,
Macready's tour of North America was dogged by Forrest, hired by rival theatres
to mount competing shows. In 1846, when Forrest toured Europe, theatres,
audiences and Macready's friends shunned the Yankee. In Edinburgh, Forrest
caught a performance of Hamlet by Macready. He stood up in his private
box and hissed out loud.
In 1848-49, Macready returned to America.
Anti-British feeling was running high over the Oregon territory dispute and was
further stirred up by newspapers and nativist politicians. On May 7, 1849, the
British actor performed Macbeth at New York's Astor Place Opera House.
Macready: "So fair and foul a day I have not seen." Paid hecklers: "Be off with
you!" The cast ducked missiles and had to mouth the rest of their lines.
Wealthy New Yorkers were furious at the incident; a man had to be
clean-shaven and wear gloves to enter the Astor Place. They persuaded Macready
to appear again on May 10. A mob of 10,000 surged outside the building, hurling
bricks at the police. Troops were called out to protect the cops' lives.
They tried a cavalry charge and a bayonet attack before firing on the
mob...
Sources listed by the Globe and Mail:
The Washington
Post, The Wall Street Journal, news services.
Astor Place Riot, May 10th 1849
34 dead, 140
injured
Ned Buntline was the famous novelist of the nineteenth century who
immortalized in legend the colorful characters: "Buffalo Bill", "Wild Bill
Hickok" and "Texas Jack". These and other real or invented characters created by
him have been re-created in countless stories and movies up to the present time.
More than four hundred "Dime Novel" adventure stories were written by Ned
Buntline. Besides writing about the Wild West, he also wrote about pirates and
the sea, politics, the Civil War, as well as many hunting and wild-life stories
... In 1848, after his early success with increasing income and fame, at
the age of 25, Ned settled down in New York.
Ned Buntline was
pro-American and bitterly anti-British, a stance which led to daily conflicts
with his wife and in-laws. He was a friend of Edwin Forrest, an American actor.
Forrest's English rival, William Charles Macready, was scheduled to play Macbeth
at the Astor Opera House in New York during May of 1849. Columns in Ned
Buntline's Own were devoted to denouncing Macready and urging American Party
supporters to action. On opening night, May 7, Ned Buntline was present. William
Charles Macready was admired by many Americans, but others wanted to see
American actors on stage. During the performance, some mild disturbance occurred
against the British actor. Ned approved the crowd's behavior as the action of
free Americans. Only three days later the performance was repeated. Ned was
ready to join with the crowd. He dressed in a blue frock coat with gilt buttons
and a tall hat and drove around town soliciting public support. He believed that
this was his chance to prove to the public that he was a real American. He was
preparing for the evening performance.
His wife, Annie, wept and begged
him on her knees not to join the crowd but Ned ignored her pleas. Taking his
sword he stormed out of the house and headed toward Astor Place. By that time,
over two hundred policemen patrolled the area knowing that a disturbance at the
opera house was planned. As many as two thousand people filled the house in an
orderly fashion, but the police were uneasy since there were only seven women in
the audience. A disturbance occurred during the first half of the performance.
At the end of the first act the police removed some people. Outside, several
thousand people were waiting, ready for action, holding egg-shaped cobblestones
in their hands. Suddenly rioting erupted, cobblestones went flying and policemen
began firing. By the time the riot ended, there were 34 killed and 140 wounded.
Ned Buntline was arrested and named as an organizer of the Astor Place
Riot ... He was found guilty and sentenced to one year at hard labor on
Blackwell's Island...
Source:
Excerpted from Ned Buntline,
King of the Dime Novels, by Dr. Thomas Kovalik, published 1996 by SamHar
Press.
http://www.story-house.com/op/ned/page9.html
Astor Place Riot, May 10th 1849
22
killed
Edwin Forrest (1806 - 1872) had a dashing, athletic style that won
him high praise from the time of his acting debut in the 1820s. When actress
Fanny Kemble saw Forrest playing Spartacus in The Gladiator, she called
him "a mountain of a man!" Forrest quickly became the leading actor in the
United States, famous for his outsized heroes and his wealth, and over the years
he never altered the formula that brought his first success. Today Forrest is
remembered for his twenty-year rivalry with British actor William Macready,
which turned tragic in 1849 when their competing New York productions of
Macbeth put a match to a flame of nativist sentiment and caused the Astor
Place riot, in which twenty-two were killed. Around 1860, Forrest commissioned
the famous photographer Mathew
Brady to photograph him in
his most famous roles ...
Source:
http://www.npg.si.edu/exh/brady/gallery/30gal.html
Riot at the Opera House!
A Staged
Reading
Featuring New York City Literary Figures
Louis Auchincloss, Pete Hamill, and Frank McCourt
6:30pm Monday, May 10, 1999
In Conjunction with the
Museum of the City of New York's exhibition
The Astor Place Riot:
Looking Back 150 Years
Performed at The Great Hall and Peter
Cooper Suite
Cooper Union, Foundation Building, 7 East 7th Street at Third
Avenue
One hundred and fifty years ago, two actors, William
Macready and Edwin Forrest, ignited one of the worst riots in New York City's
history. A symbol of British aristocracy, Macready entered into this eruptive
event at a disadvantage having offended local New Yorkers with his comments
about their boorish and uncultured nature. His adversary, Edwin Forrest, an
American-born Shakespearean actor, shared the fierce determination of
working-class New Yorkers not to be dominated by elite outsiders.
On May
10, 1849, a crowd of roughly 15,000 assembled in front of the Astor Place Opera
House to protest the appearance of the English Shakespearean actor William
Charles Macready in a performance of Macbeth. Stones were hurled through the
windows of the theater and crowds attempted to break down the doors to get at
the audience inside. The police were overwhelmed and troops were called in,
subsequently firing into the crowd, killing more than 20 people. The riot grew
out of a personal feud between Macready and his American counterpart Edwin
Forrest. On the surface the issues that divided them seemed rooted in
professional competition. The animosity between the two actors, however, tapped
into deeper and more complex social issues, including class antagonisms and
anti-British feelings.
Riot at the Opera House! A Staged Reading, drawn
entirely from the first-person testimony of these key figures and from
journalistic accounts recorded in the leading newspapers of the time, presents a
live narrative of the events that led to this tragedy and recounts the confusion
and horror of that infamous night.
The script prepared by Andrew Davis,
a contributing curator to the Museum's exhibition The Astor Place Riot:
Looking Back 150 Years, has constructed reading roles for the key
witnesses from primary sources. Portions of William Macready's diaries offer an
extensive account of the riot while letters written by Edwin Forrest illustrate
the growing feud between the actors. Additional testimony comes from Caleb
Woodhull, the newly elected mayor of New York City; George W. Matsell, the chief
of police, whose unarmed officers were quickly overwhelmed by the mob; and Major
General Charles Sandford, who commanded the troops brought in to quell the
disturbance. Intermixed in the narrative are newspaper accounts and commentary
from James Gordon Bennett's New York Herald, Horace Greeley's New York
Tribune, and William Cullen Bryant's Evening Post, whose coverage and
editorializing helped inflame the passions of the City.
Cast in the lead
reading roles of William Macready, Edwin Forrest, and James Gordon Bennett are
three members of the Museum's Board of Trustees. Louis Auchincloss, who has
written extensively on New York's blue-bloods, provides the voice of Macready,
the favorite of the elite. Frank McCourt, whose memoir Angela's Ashes
details his own Irish boyhood, plays the reading role of Edwin Forrest, whose
supporters came largely from the Irish Bowery B'hoys. Pete Hamill, former editor
of New York's hometown newspaper, the Daily News, appropriately provides
the narrative voice of journalist James Gordon Bennett. Other New York
luminaries are being drafted to bring life to the voices of their 19th century
counterparts.
[Source:
http://www.netresource.com/mcny/astorriotpr.htm ]
Also see:
- The Astor Place Riots: Looking Back 150 Years
http://newyork.sidewalk.com/detail/99369
- The Astor Place Riot
http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/nypd/html/3100/retro-3.html
- "That Play" is just one of the euphemisms actors use to avoid mentioning
the title of William Shakespeare's Macbeth, one of the most ill-starred
plays in theatrical history. The curse took its greatest toll in the Astor
Place riot in New York City in 1849...
http://www.sjdccd.cc.ca.us/PerfArts/Drama/d10/d10.Macbeth.html
http://www.connectedcourseware.com/ccweb/cyberhis/macbsup.htm
Nova Scotia
In 1849 the Associated Press couriers rode alone, often at
night, on narrow roads not much more than trails, with few travellers, with
parts of the route through isolated areas far from any habitation. In 1849, the
Nova Scotia Pony Express was an essential link in the international
communications system, often carrying news comparable to what, in the late
twentieth century, would be classified by international television news
companies as Breaking News, to be transmitted over hastily-arranged
communications satellite channels. The competition was intense. More than once
in 1849 — when negotiations between London and Washington were very tense and
war between Great Britain and the United States was by no means unthinkable —
news about an important British government decision — carried swiftly across
Nova Scotia by Daniel Craig's express and telegraphed by the Associated Press
from Saint John — was being sold on the streets of New York and Boston for a
penny a copy, as much as 24 hours before the official message reached
Washington by telegraph after the Cunard steamship arrived at its United States
destination. Presidents James Polk (before 5 March 1849) and Zachary Taylor
(after 5 March 1849) were not amused by such occurrences, but that didn't
bother James Gordon Bennett or his newspaper competitors.
The Oregon Boundary
Dispute
The Oregon Boundary Dispute was a hot
topic during 1849. This dispute has nothing to do with the Nova Scotia
Pony Express story, except as a vivid illustration of the importance of
some of the information it carried.
In the 1844 United States
Presidential Election, the Democratic platform claimed the entire
Oregon area, from the California boundary northward to a latitude of
54° 40', the southern boundary of Russian Alaska. This claim
included all of present-day British Columbia.
In 1849, the Oregon
Boundary dispute remained unsettled.
In 1849, there was a serious
threat of war between Great Britain and the United States over the
Oregon Boundary question.
The excerpts below are included here to
enable the reader to get a feeling of the serious nature of this
dispute. Some of the mail bags carried by Cunard's Royal mail
Steamships in 1849, both westbound and eastbound, contained highly
confidential diplomatic messages between London and
Washington, conveying veiled threats of a most serious nature. George Mullane's article about the 1849
situation uses direct language: "...international crisis..."
and "...England's ultimatum..." which accurately conveys the temper of
the times. |
Note 5:
Source:
http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/provisionalguide/1849Map.html
Oregon
State Archives
Guide to Provisional and Territorial Records, 1849 Map
Oregon was admitted as a U.S. territory on August 14, 1848. According to the
1849 census, there were 8903 white inhabitants of the territory. The Treaty
with Great Britain in Regard to Limits Westward of the Rocky Mountains
(1846), otherwise known as the U.S.-Great Britain Boundary Treaty of 1846, set
the northern boundary of Oregon Territory at latitude 49°. The ten counties
which now existed in Oregon still encompassed all of the area between latitudes
49° and 42° and west of the crest of the Rockies, an area of over 285,580 square
miles about 740,000 square kilometres.
Note 6:
Source:
http://www.semo.net/suburb/dlswoff/Bios/polk.html
America at War:
American Military History
Revolutionary War to World War II
In his stand
on Oregon, James Polk, President of the Unites States 4 March 1845 to
3 March 1849, seemed to be risking war with Great Britain. The 1844
Democratic platform claimed the entire Oregon area, from the California boundary
northward to a latitude of 54° 40', the southern boundary of Russian
Alaska. Extremists proclaimed "Fifty-four forty or fight," but Polk, aware
of diplomatic realities, knew that no course short of war was likely to get all
of Oregon. Happily, neither he nor the British wanted a war. He offered to
settle by extending the Canadian boundary, along the 49th parallel, from
the Rockies to the Pacific. When the British minister declined, Polk reasserted
the American claim to the entire area. Finally, the British settled for the 49th
parallel, except for the southern tip of Vancouver Island...
Note 7:
Source:
http://www.washington.edu/uwired/outreach/cspn/hstaa432/lesson_8/
Center for the Study of the Pacific Northwest, Lesson 8
Settlement of
the Oregon Boundary Question
The Pacific coast area in dispute, called the
Oregon country, stretched from the crest of the Rockies in the east to the ocean
in the west, and from the 42nd parallel in the south (today's California-Oregon
border) to the parallel of 54 degrees, 40 minutes in the north (today's
Alaska-British Columbia border)... Few Americans today pay much attention to the
Oregon Treaty of 1846. The nation's acquisitions by war have seemed more
dramatic, and even its acquisitions by purchase have seemed more memorable. The
diplomatic negotiations that produced the treaty perhaps appear dull, as if the
two sides finally just arrived at a fair compromise. Maybe there is a sense,
too, that the U.S. did not take the far corner of the Pacific Northwest so much
from another nation or people as it did from a company, the HBC, whose own
operations were inhibiting American-style "development" of the region. It
would be best, however, to keep in mind that in Canada, across the border that
the Oregon Treaty extended in 1849, feelings are different. There, the Oregon
Treaty is often remembered vividly as a loss, and one of many examples of
American disrespect for Canadian borders and national integrity. Thus
James R. Gibson, a Canadian geographer, writes in Farming the Frontier: The
Agricultural Opening of the Oregon Country 1786-1846 (1985):
The Oregon
Treaty was not a fair compromise; there was no division of the 'Oregon
triangle' [the disputed lands in Washington state], all of which went to the
United States....Canadians have valid reasons for regretting and even resenting
the Oregon settlement, since the British claim to the territory north of the
Columbia-Snake-Clearwater river system was at least as good as, if not better
than, that of the United States on the grounds of discovery, exploration, and
settlement, and since the future Canadian Dominion was deprived of any harbour
on Puget Sound....Canadians should not forget that they were dispossessed of
part of their rightful Columbia heritage, a heritage whose economic potential in
general and agricultural possibilities in particular were initially and
successfully demonstrated by the Hudson's Bay Company. They should also
remember that whenever it is tritely declared that Canada and the United States
share the longest undefended border in the world, it is so mainly because the
stronger American republic won its northern boundary disputes at the expense of
its weaker neighbour, just as it southern boundary was gained at the expense of
a weaker Mexico.
Gibson's interpretation reflects a
longstanding and pervasive Canadian concern about the sheer power of the United
States as well as an accurate memory of the many threats that Americans have
posed to the integrity of Canadian borders and Canadian national identity. I
would, however, add one caveat to Gibson's formulation. When the Oregon Treaty
was signed, the Confederation of Canada did not exist; America's northern
neighbor was not a nation, but rather several British colonies. When the U.S.
negotiated the Oregon Treaty, it did so with Great Britain, not Canada, so it is
logical to keep Britain's participation in the treaty in mind (there was as of
yet no official Canadian participation in diplomacy). Canadian views of this
British participation hint at different kinds of weakness in the face of
American strength. Gibson, for example, refers to a British mood of
"appeasement" in yielding western Washington to the U.S., while another Canadian
scholar (John Saywell, Canada: Pathways to the Present [1994]), recalls
not only American aggression but also British carelessness in giving "what is
now Washington and Oregon to the United States." American interpretations, by
contrast, do not portray Britain as weak, and thus do not tend to see the Oregon
Treaty as a deal struck with a "weaker neighbour." Quite the contrary, in fact.
In explaining President Polk's decision to accept the 49th parallel as the
boundary, Robert H. Ferrell, in American Diplomacy: A History (1975),
writes that Polk "had given in to Great Britain [rather than standing up for
more territory]. It was one thing to press territorial claims against a nation
such as Mexico, and quite another to stand up to the most powerful nation in the
world, as Britain was during the nineteenth century."
Canadians and Americans tend to recall the Oregon Treaty in
distinctly different ways. In this case and in virtually every other, how one
interprets the past depends in large part upon where one is viewing it from.
More About the Nova Scotia Pony ExpressThe 1849 Nova Scotia Pony Express
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyexdx.html
Photographs of the Nova Scotia
Pony Express monument
http://www.newscotland1398.net/annapco/ponyexmon.html
The Pony Express Plaque Installed in 1949 100th
Anniversary
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex04.html
Halifax Express The Novascotian, 26
February 1849
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex66.html
Halifax Express The British Colonist, 10
March 1849
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex67.html
Halifax Express The Acadian Recorder, 10
March 1849
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex68.html
The Second Run of the Nova Scotia Pony Express 8
March 1849
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex09.html
Nova Scotia Pony Express 1849, by John Regan 5
January 1912
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex01.html
Nova Scotia Pony Express 1849, by George Mullane
1 Jan 1914
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex02.html
Nova Scotia Pony Express 1849, by Murrille
Schofield 1973
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex03.html
Nova Scotia Pony Express, by D. A. MacNeill April
1940
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex16.html
Nova Scotia Pony Express, by CBC Radio 11 June
1999
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex20.html
The Cunard Steamship fleet, 1849 These ships
brought the news carried by the Pony Express
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex13.html
Burket's Exchange News Room Halifax 1848-1849
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex17.html
Pony Express Editorial, Halifax
Chronicle-Herald 15 Feb 1999
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex06.html
Radio Station X1J1F Victoria Beach, Nova Scotia,
1999 set up in recognition of the 150th anniversary of the 1849
Nova Scotia Pony Express
http://www.newscotland1398.net/ponyexpress/ponyex11.html
|
Go To: Nova Scotia
History
http://alts.net/ns1625/histindx.html
Photographs of War Memorials, Historic Monuments
and Plaques in Nova Scotia
http://www.newscotland1398.net/remem/plaques.html
Go To: Nova Scotia
Quotations
http://alts.net/ns1625/quotes.html
Go To: History of
Telephone Companies in Nova Scotia
http://alts.net/ns1625/telephone.html
Go To: History of Railway
Companies in Nova Scotia
http://alts.net/ns1625/railways.html
Go To: History of Electric
Companies in Nova Scotia
http://alts.net/ns1625/electric.html
Go To: History of
Automobiles in Nova Scotia
http://alts.net/ns1625/automobiles.html
Go To:
Home Page
http://www.newscotland1398.net/index.html